Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income declared under the IDS-2016 became chargeable to tax under the Income-tax Act in the previous year in which the declaration was made when the declarant failed to pay the tax, surcharge and penalty within the prescribed time. As the declaration was filed on 28.09.2016, the Tribunal held that the Revenue could not reopen and assess that amount in AY 2013-14. The reassessment and corresponding addition for that year were therefore unsustainable in law, and the addition was deleted.
Income declared under the IDS-2016 became chargeable to tax under the Income-tax Act in the previous year in which the declaration was made when the declarant failed to pay the tax, surcharge and penalty within the prescribed time. As the declaration was filed on 28.09.2016, the Tribunal held that the Revenue could not reopen and assess that amount in AY 2013-14. The reassessment and corresponding addition for that year were therefore unsustainable in law, and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.