Jurisdictional sanction requirements bar reassessment when approval comes from an authority lacking statutory competence under the applicable framewor...
Recorded sales receipts cannot be reassessed as unexplained cash credits, eliminating the basis for consequential alleged commission expenditure addit...
Sufficient cause for delayed income-tax appeals requires bona fide diligence; unsubstantiated counsel illness and assessee inaction defeat condonation...
TNMM Segmentation Limits Transfer-Pricing Adjustments to Associated-Enterprise Transactions and Requires Turnover-Based Comparable Selection for IT Se...
GST registration cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns was treated as amenable to restoration where the taxpayer was ready to file all pending returns and pay tax dues with applicable interest, penalty and late fee. Following its earlier decision on similar facts, the HC directed the proper authority to consider restoration under the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 rather than treating cancellation as final. The taxpayer was allowed sixty days to apply for restoration, and the authority was required to act expeditiously on compliance with the statutory requirements.
GST registration cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns was treated as amenable to restoration where the taxpayer was ready to file all pending returns and pay tax dues with applicable interest, penalty and late fee. Following its earlier decision on similar facts, the HC directed the proper authority to consider restoration under the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 rather than treating cancellation as final. The taxpayer was allowed sixty days to apply for restoration, and the authority was required to act expeditiously on compliance with the statutory requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
