Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
A belated operational creditor claim in CIRP was rejected because the claimant did not supply the breakup and supporting material needed for verification, and the claim could not be matched with the corporate debtor's records. The NCLAT held that the claimant failed to rebut the Resolution Professional's reasons for rejection, including non-response to repeated requests and lack of proof for the asserted interest component. Because the resolution process had already advanced to the stage where the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors and filed before the Adjudicating Authority, the deficient claim could not be entertained. The rejection was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
A belated operational creditor claim in CIRP was rejected because the claimant did not supply the breakup and supporting material needed for verification, and the claim could not be matched with the corporate debtor's records. The NCLAT held that the claimant failed to rebut the Resolution Professional's reasons for rejection, including non-response to repeated requests and lack of proof for the asserted interest component. Because the resolution process had already advanced to the stage where the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors and filed before the Adjudicating Authority, the deficient claim could not be entertained. The rejection was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
