Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under section 11, a trust could set off excess charitable expenditure of earlier years against income of the subsequent year for AY 2017-18, because pre-01/04/2022 law contained no restriction that income must be applied only in the year it arose. The Finance Act, 2021 insertion of Explanation 5 to section 11(1), which bars such set-off, was treated as prospective from 01/04/2022. The claim could not be rejected for want of Form 9A, as that form was not required for this adjustment. The ITAT remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer only to verify the carried forward deficit and supporting records before granting relief.
Under section 11, a trust could set off excess charitable expenditure of earlier years against income of the subsequent year for AY 2017-18, because pre-01/04/2022 law contained no restriction that income must be applied only in the year it arose. The Finance Act, 2021 insertion of Explanation 5 to section 11(1), which bars such set-off, was treated as prospective from 01/04/2022. The claim could not be rejected for want of Form 9A, as that form was not required for this adjustment. The ITAT remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer only to verify the carried forward deficit and supporting records before granting relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
