Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Exemption under section 54 was upheld where the assessee had substantially paid the vendor and taken possession under an unregistered agreement, bringing the transaction within part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal accepted that registration was not ative on these facts and noted that the same transaction had been accepted in the vendor's assessment. It also found no defect in title material already on record and rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the conveyance deed had been before the Assessing Officer. The appellate order granting exemption was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Exemption under section 54 was upheld where the assessee had substantially paid the vendor and taken possession under an unregistered agreement, bringing the transaction within part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal accepted that registration was not ative on these facts and noted that the same transaction had been accepted in the vendor's assessment. It also found no defect in title material already on record and rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the conveyance deed had been before the Assessing Officer. The appellate order granting exemption was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.