Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability for non fulfilment of EPCG export obligations was...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer control.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Liability for non fulfilment of EPCG export obligations was confirmed, with the importer held liable for differential customs duty and unpaid interest; the appellant had deposited duty but interest remains recoverable by revenue. Separately, confiscation of goods, redemption fine and penalty were set aside because non fulfilment arose from circumstances beyond the importer's control and there was no allegation or finding of fraud, applying the Tribunal's prior approach to similar EPCG cases; duty and interest liability remains enforceable while punitive measures were quashed.
Liability for non fulfilment of EPCG export obligations was confirmed, with the importer held liable for differential customs duty and unpaid interest; the appellant had deposited duty but interest remains recoverable by revenue. Separately, confiscation of goods, redemption fine and penalty were set aside because non fulfilment arose from circumstances beyond the importer's control and there was no allegation or finding of fraud, applying the Tribunal's prior approach to similar EPCG cases; duty and interest liability remains enforceable while punitive measures were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.