Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business prof...
On certiorari review of an order under Section 74 concerning alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit by misstatement and suppression, the court found that reasons were recorded and relevant factors considered and therefore declined to interfere absent any shown perversity or mala fides; the petitioner's request to waive or reduce the statutory pre deposit for filing a statutory appeal was refused for lack of extraordinary circumstances; the writ petition challenging the Section 74 order was dismissed, and the court's observations were treated as tentative and without prejudice to any appeal on merits.
On certiorari review of an order under Section 74 concerning alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit by misstatement and suppression, the court found that reasons were recorded and relevant factors considered and therefore declined to interfere absent any shown perversity or mala fides; the petitioner's request to waive or reduce the statutory pre deposit for filing a statutory appeal was refused for lack of extraordinary circumstances; the writ petition challenging the Section 74 order was dismissed, and the court's observations were treated as tentative and without prejudice to any appeal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
