Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing issue concerned royalty paid to an associated enterprise where the adjustment was negated in favour of the taxpayer because the earlier appellate decision in the taxpayer's own case on the same issue precluded fresh adjustment; the assessing officer had relied on a prior TPO finding but the appellate precedent established nil ALP, resulting in relief. Separately, claim for deduction under the industrial/infrastructure undertaking provision for participation in a micro irrigation project was allowed after the taxpayer produced execution copies, invoices, payments and certificates; a typographical error in the agreement party name was held not to defeat entitlement and the revenue failed to rebut the evidence.
Transfer pricing issue concerned royalty paid to an associated enterprise where the adjustment was negated in favour of the taxpayer because the earlier appellate decision in the taxpayer's own case on the same issue precluded fresh adjustment; the assessing officer had relied on a prior TPO finding but the appellate precedent established nil ALP, resulting in relief. Separately, claim for deduction under the industrial/infrastructure undertaking provision for participation in a micro irrigation project was allowed after the taxpayer produced execution copies, invoices, payments and certificates; a typographical error in the agreement party name was held not to defeat entitlement and the revenue failed to rebut the evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.