Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that contractual rebates conceded by a builder do not give rise to deemed income under the deeming provision where the agreed consideration exceeds the stamp/circle rate and rebates form part of the payment terms, so the addition treating such rebates as income from other sources was deleted. On the exemption claim, the Tribunal found the purchaser's acquisition satisfied the substantive 'purchase' test for residential exemption and that intra-family gifts and co-ownership did not amount to a colourable device to deny eligibility; denial of the exemption was reversed and appeal allowed.
ITAT held that contractual rebates conceded by a builder do not give rise to deemed income under the deeming provision where the agreed consideration exceeds the stamp/circle rate and rebates form part of the payment terms, so the addition treating such rebates as income from other sources was deleted. On the exemption claim, the Tribunal found the purchaser's acquisition satisfied the substantive 'purchase' test for residential exemption and that intra-family gifts and co-ownership did not amount to a colourable device to deny eligibility; denial of the exemption was reversed and appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.