Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Notice to show cause lacked relevant particulars, breaching principles of natural justice and preventing a meaningful response; accordingly the adjudication was vitiated and must be set aside. Adjudication without providing a hearing violated the statutory hearing right and further undermines validity, as did repetition of the same order and subsequent communications issued after the adjudicator became functus officio, which were held to be without jurisdiction. The matter is remitted for fresh consideration after the notice-issuing authority supplies full particulars and the affected party files a reply; electronic ledger debits arising from the invalid order are to be reversed and recredited.
Notice to show cause lacked relevant particulars, breaching principles of natural justice and preventing a meaningful response; accordingly the adjudication was vitiated and must be set aside. Adjudication without providing a hearing violated the statutory hearing right and further undermines validity, as did repetition of the same order and subsequent communications issued after the adjudicator became functus officio, which were held to be without jurisdiction. The matter is remitted for fresh consideration after the notice-issuing authority supplies full particulars and the affected party files a reply; electronic ledger debits arising from the invalid order are to be reversed and recredited.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
