Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional attachment of the property was confirmed under the PBPT Act as the transaction falls within the scope of benami property under Section 2(9)(A); the appellant failed to explain sources of funds, did not produce original lease evidence and adverse inference was drawn for non-production, supporting IO findings of fabrication. Beneficial ownership remains under investigation-IO to re-investigate whether the beneficial owner includes the named individual, his son, and/or a company-so the property is not to be released. The Tribunal may modify AA orders under Section 46(4)(e); appeal by the benamidar is dismissed.
Provisional attachment of the property was confirmed under the PBPT Act as the transaction falls within the scope of benami property under Section 2(9)(A); the appellant failed to explain sources of funds, did not produce original lease evidence and adverse inference was drawn for non-production, supporting IO findings of fabrication. Beneficial ownership remains under investigation-IO to re-investigate whether the beneficial owner includes the named individual, his son, and/or a company-so the property is not to be released. The Tribunal may modify AA orders under Section 46(4)(e); appeal by the benamidar is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
