Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Habeas corpus petition found maintainable where remand order was not in accordance with law, rendering the arrest illegal; court applied the "reasons to believe" standard to assess whether arrest relied on credible evidence or mere suspicion and found remand record silent on that inquiry, undermining exercise of arrest powers under the special statute. Failure to show service of grounds of arrest and non compliance with departmental arrest guidelines led the court to hold the remand order legally infirm and to set it aside, allowing the writ.
Habeas corpus petition found maintainable where remand order was not in accordance with law, rendering the arrest illegal; court applied the "reasons to believe" standard to assess whether arrest relied on credible evidence or mere suspicion and found remand record silent on that inquiry, undermining exercise of arrest powers under the special statute. Failure to show service of grounds of arrest and non compliance with departmental arrest guidelines led the court to hold the remand order legally infirm and to set it aside, allowing the writ.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.