Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Blocking of the electronic credit ledger was challenged while parallel proceedings imposing tax, interest, fee and penalty under statutory tax provisions were pending; the petitioner's failure to disclose those proceedings in the writ was held material and counselling non-interference by the writ forum. Because the re-blocking related to an assessment and penalty demand of substantial amount and the statutory one year period since initial blocking had not expired, the court declined to interfere and dismissed the writ, leaving the statutory adjudication and credit availability/utilisation to proceed.
Blocking of the electronic credit ledger was challenged while parallel proceedings imposing tax, interest, fee and penalty under statutory tax provisions were pending; the petitioner's failure to disclose those proceedings in the writ was held material and counselling non-interference by the writ forum. Because the re-blocking related to an assessment and penalty demand of substantial amount and the statutory one year period since initial blocking had not expired, the court declined to interfere and dismissed the writ, leaving the statutory adjudication and credit availability/utilisation to proceed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.