Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Show cause notice sought cancellation of GST registration for alleged breach of Rule 21(e) by claiming input tax credit from non existent or non operating suppliers; the notice relied on a DGGI communication as supporting material. Petitioner filed specific replies (including Form GST REG 18) addressing the allegation, indicating understanding of charges; the court found no prejudice from the mode of communication and held the proper officer may decide the cancellation matter on the basis of those replies in accordance with law within two weeks. The writ petition was disposed with that direction and the petitioner's cited decisions were found inapplicable.
Show cause notice sought cancellation of GST registration for alleged breach of Rule 21(e) by claiming input tax credit from non existent or non operating suppliers; the notice relied on a DGGI communication as supporting material. Petitioner filed specific replies (including Form GST REG 18) addressing the allegation, indicating understanding of charges; the court found no prejudice from the mode of communication and held the proper officer may decide the cancellation matter on the basis of those replies in accordance with law within two weeks. The writ petition was disposed with that direction and the petitioner's cited decisions were found inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.