Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Show cause notice sought cancellation of GST registration for alleged breach of Rule 21(e) by claiming input tax credit from non existent or non operating suppliers; the notice relied on a DGGI communication as supporting material. Petitioner filed specific replies (including Form GST REG 18) addressing the allegation, indicating understanding of charges; the court found no prejudice from the mode of communication and held the proper officer may decide the cancellation matter on the basis of those replies in accordance with law within two weeks. The writ petition was disposed with that direction and the petitioner's cited decisions were found inapplicable.
Show cause notice sought cancellation of GST registration for alleged breach of Rule 21(e) by claiming input tax credit from non existent or non operating suppliers; the notice relied on a DGGI communication as supporting material. Petitioner filed specific replies (including Form GST REG 18) addressing the allegation, indicating understanding of charges; the court found no prejudice from the mode of communication and held the proper officer may decide the cancellation matter on the basis of those replies in accordance with law within two weeks. The writ petition was disposed with that direction and the petitioner's cited decisions were found inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.