Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Rectification was allowed to permit set off of brought forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation where a mistake apparent on the face of the record rendered the return inconsistent with an earlier rectified income figure. Tribunal held that although a claim for set off was not made in the original return and precedent bars allowing such a claim by letter during assessment, the revised returned income from the rectification order must govern when no fresh additions were made in the assessment conducted after seizure proceedings; consequently the returned income was to be treated like the earlier rectified return and the appeal was allowed.
Rectification was allowed to permit set off of brought forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation where a mistake apparent on the face of the record rendered the return inconsistent with an earlier rectified income figure. Tribunal held that although a claim for set off was not made in the original return and precedent bars allowing such a claim by letter during assessment, the revised returned income from the rectification order must govern when no fresh additions were made in the assessment conducted after seizure proceedings; consequently the returned income was to be treated like the earlier rectified return and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
