Constitutional personal-liberty safeguards limit PMLA twin bail conditions where completed investigations lead to prolonged incarceration before trial...
Automated airline software subscriptions without human intervention fail technical-services characterisation and do not make available underlying tech...
Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under GST rules a revocation application requires prior filing of returns and payment of dues; limitation exists to ensure statutory compliance and protect third party rights, but cancellation of GST registration typically prejudices only the assessee and not third parties. The writ court may condone delay in statutory or quasi judicial proceedings, and on that basis the High Court set aside the dismissal of the appeal for limitation and directed the Appellate Authority to re hear and decide the revocation of cancellation on merits, permitting reconsideration rather than rejection on time bar grounds.
Under GST rules a revocation application requires prior filing of returns and payment of dues; limitation exists to ensure statutory compliance and protect third party rights, but cancellation of GST registration typically prejudices only the assessee and not third parties. The writ court may condone delay in statutory or quasi judicial proceedings, and on that basis the High Court set aside the dismissal of the appeal for limitation and directed the Appellate Authority to re hear and decide the revocation of cancellation on merits, permitting reconsideration rather than rejection on time bar grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.