Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cancellation of registration under section 12A was challenged on grounds that the assessing officer treated non maintenance of books for business incidental to objects (clause (b) of the Explanation to section 12AB(4)) as the ground without issuing a show cause notice or hearing. The tribunal found clause (b) distinct from clause (e) (activity not genuine) and held absence of opportunity prejudicial; it admitted additional evidence sought by the assessee and set aside the cancellation order for de novo adjudication by the CIT(E) after considering the newly filed evidence. Appeal partly allowed and remand ordered.
Cancellation of registration under section 12A was challenged on grounds that the assessing officer treated non maintenance of books for business incidental to objects (clause (b) of the Explanation to section 12AB(4)) as the ground without issuing a show cause notice or hearing. The tribunal found clause (b) distinct from clause (e) (activity not genuine) and held absence of opportunity prejudicial; it admitted additional evidence sought by the assessee and set aside the cancellation order for de novo adjudication by the CIT(E) after considering the newly filed evidence. Appeal partly allowed and remand ordered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.