Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioner proved payment of GST by documentary verification from the tax authority and submitted a supplementary agreement; respondents' refusal to reimburse on account of a final bill and a no-claim certificate was found legally unsustainable. The supplementary agreement, though not executed by the respondent, was presented with due signature and cannot be imputed as petitioner's fault, and parallel administrative acceptances of similar claims were noted. Operatively, the petitioner is entitled to GST neutralisation and the department is directed to accept the claim and reimburse the GST amount as due.
Petitioner proved payment of GST by documentary verification from the tax authority and submitted a supplementary agreement; respondents' refusal to reimburse on account of a final bill and a no-claim certificate was found legally unsustainable. The supplementary agreement, though not executed by the respondent, was presented with due signature and cannot be imputed as petitioner's fault, and parallel administrative acceptances of similar claims were noted. Operatively, the petitioner is entitled to GST neutralisation and the department is directed to accept the claim and reimburse the GST amount as due.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
