E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Petitioner proved payment of GST by documentary verification from the tax authority and submitted a supplementary agreement; respondents' refusal to reimburse on account of a final bill and a no-claim certificate was found legally unsustainable. The supplementary agreement, though not executed by the respondent, was presented with due signature and cannot be imputed as petitioner's fault, and parallel administrative acceptances of similar claims were noted. Operatively, the petitioner is entitled to GST neutralisation and the department is directed to accept the claim and reimburse the GST amount as due.
Petitioner proved payment of GST by documentary verification from the tax authority and submitted a supplementary agreement; respondents' refusal to reimburse on account of a final bill and a no-claim certificate was found legally unsustainable. The supplementary agreement, though not executed by the respondent, was presented with due signature and cannot be imputed as petitioner's fault, and parallel administrative acceptances of similar claims were noted. Operatively, the petitioner is entitled to GST neutralisation and the department is directed to accept the claim and reimburse the GST amount as due.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
