Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Page of 4886
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 97710 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioner proved payment of GST by documentary verification from the tax authority and submitted a supplementary agreement; respondents' refusal to reimburse on account of a final bill and a no-claim certificate was found legally unsustainable. The supplementary agreement, though not executed by the respondent, was presented with due signature and cannot be imputed as petitioner's fault, and parallel administrative acceptances of similar claims were noted. Operatively, the petitioner is entitled to GST neutralisation and the department is directed to accept the claim and reimburse the GST amount as due.
Petitioner proved payment of GST by documentary verification from the tax authority and submitted a supplementary agreement; respondents' refusal to reimburse on account of a final bill and a no-claim certificate was found legally unsustainable. The supplementary agreement, though not executed by the respondent, was presented with due signature and cannot be imputed as petitioner's fault, and parallel administrative acceptances of similar claims were noted. Operatively, the petitioner is entitled to GST neutralisation and the department is directed to accept the claim and reimburse the GST amount as due.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
