Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The article addresses profiteering and computation of profiteering focusing on pass-through of input tax credit (ITC) where the flat was booked post-GST. Applying judicial guidance, the DGAP examined ITC availed and pre- and post-GST purchase values and concluded no contravention of section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, because the price was set after ITC availability and no enforceable right arose for the purchaser merely from a seller's confirmation to pass on ITC; the applicant's objections were examined and rejected as without merit.
The article addresses profiteering and computation of profiteering focusing on pass-through of input tax credit (ITC) where the flat was booked post-GST. Applying judicial guidance, the DGAP examined ITC availed and pre- and post-GST purchase values and concluded no contravention of section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, because the price was set after ITC availability and no enforceable right arose for the purchaser merely from a seller's confirmation to pass on ITC; the applicant's objections were examined and rejected as without merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.