Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Primary issue: whether investments made by the charitable trust in a partnership where a trustee had substantial interest breached the prescribed investment modes in section 11(5) and attracted s.13 disqualification. Reasoning: the investment was not in the modes specified by s.11(5) and the recipient was a related party within s.13, thereby invoking s.13(2)(h) which excludes s.11 exemption; the AO erroneously applied law by allowing the deduction despite audit certification and material on record. Outcome: exemption under s.11 disallowed and income taxable at maximum marginal rate; s.263 revision was rightly invoked. - ITAT
Primary issue: whether investments made by the charitable trust in a partnership where a trustee had substantial interest breached the prescribed investment modes in section 11(5) and attracted s.13 disqualification. Reasoning: the investment was not in the modes specified by s.11(5) and the recipient was a related party within s.13, thereby invoking s.13(2)(h) which excludes s.11 exemption; the AO erroneously applied law by allowing the deduction despite audit certification and material on record. Outcome: exemption under s.11 disallowed and income taxable at maximum marginal rate; s.263 revision was rightly invoked. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.