Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
The court held that where the subject matter relates to different financial years, a composite intimation and single show-cause notice are impermissible: separate intimations and, after considering statutory replies, separate DRC-01 show-cause proceedings are required - consequence: the impugned intimation and show-cause notice are quashed and set aside. The court permitted respondents liberty to reinitiate proceedings lawfully and to take appropriate action on or before 15.1.2026, and directed that any adjudication thereafter be completed within a reasonable time but not later than 31.3.2026. - HC
The court held that where the subject matter relates to different financial years, a composite intimation and single show-cause notice are impermissible: separate intimations and, after considering statutory replies, separate DRC-01 show-cause proceedings are required - consequence: the impugned intimation and show-cause notice are quashed and set aside. The court permitted respondents liberty to reinitiate proceedings lawfully and to take appropriate action on or before 15.1.2026, and directed that any adjudication thereafter be completed within a reasonable time but not later than 31.3.2026. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
