Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
The principal issue was whether the taxpayer's refund claim for accumulated input tax credit, filed in Form GST RFD-01 after portal-size constraints prevented uploading supporting shipping bills and after earlier rejection and re-credit to the electronic credit ledger, was maintainable despite the portal error and the issuance of a deficiency memo under Rule 89(5) alleging non-debit of credit. The court found the claim substantively supported by compliance with Circular No.125/44/2019-GST and related submissions, and directed respondents to verify the enclosed documents and process the refund claim accordingly, allowing the petition. - HC
The principal issue was whether the taxpayer's refund claim for accumulated input tax credit, filed in Form GST RFD-01 after portal-size constraints prevented uploading supporting shipping bills and after earlier rejection and re-credit to the electronic credit ledger, was maintainable despite the portal error and the issuance of a deficiency memo under Rule 89(5) alleging non-debit of credit. The court found the claim substantively supported by compliance with Circular No.125/44/2019-GST and related submissions, and directed respondents to verify the enclosed documents and process the refund claim accordingly, allowing the petition. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
