Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petition challenged the validity of government notifications and an order under section 73 of the CGST Act; Court held the principal issue was availability of an alternate remedy and directed relegation to statutory appeal against the order dated 26 June 2024, permitting all substantive grounds to be raised on merits - outcome: petition dismissed and appellants relegated to appeal. The Court further held that if the appeal succeeds, challenge to the notifications will be unnecessary, but if the appeal fails, liberty to challenge the notifications is preserved. - HC
Petition challenged the validity of government notifications and an order under section 73 of the CGST Act; Court held the principal issue was availability of an alternate remedy and directed relegation to statutory appeal against the order dated 26 June 2024, permitting all substantive grounds to be raised on merits - outcome: petition dismissed and appellants relegated to appeal. The Court further held that if the appeal succeeds, challenge to the notifications will be unnecessary, but if the appeal fails, liberty to challenge the notifications is preserved. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
