Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial and reversal of input tax credit solely on the ground of limitation under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act was challenged. The Court held that, in view of the retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) with effect from 01.07.2017, ITC cannot be denied where the claim was otherwise time-barred under Section 16(4) but fell within the extended period under Section 16(5) for relevant financial years, including where GSTR-3B was filed on or before 30.11.2021. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed to that extent, the department was restrained from initiating limitation-based proceedings, and the matter was remanded. - HC
Denial and reversal of input tax credit solely on the ground of limitation under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act was challenged. The Court held that, in view of the retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) with effect from 01.07.2017, ITC cannot be denied where the claim was otherwise time-barred under Section 16(4) but fell within the extended period under Section 16(5) for relevant financial years, including where GSTR-3B was filed on or before 30.11.2021. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed to that extent, the department was restrained from initiating limitation-based proceedings, and the matter was remanded. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
