Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Healthcare services rendered for diagnosis, treatment, or care of dermatological diseases such as psoriasis, dandruff, dermatitis, fungal infections, folliculitis, and similar ailments were treated as "health care services" and held exempt under Sl. No. 74 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), since they are therapeutic services aimed at treating medical conditions; exemption was allowed for such services. Services in the nature of hair transplant/hair fixing or other cosmetic/plastic procedures were held not to qualify for the exemption where undertaken for aesthetic enhancement, and would be exempt only if performed to restore or reconstruct anatomy or bodily functions affected by congenital defect, developmental abnormality, injury, or trauma; exemption was denied for purely cosmetic services. - AAR
Healthcare services rendered for diagnosis, treatment, or care of dermatological diseases such as psoriasis, dandruff, dermatitis, fungal infections, folliculitis, and similar ailments were treated as "health care services" and held exempt under Sl. No. 74 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), since they are therapeutic services aimed at treating medical conditions; exemption was allowed for such services. Services in the nature of hair transplant/hair fixing or other cosmetic/plastic procedures were held not to qualify for the exemption where undertaken for aesthetic enhancement, and would be exempt only if performed to restore or reconstruct anatomy or bodily functions affected by congenital defect, developmental abnormality, injury, or trauma; exemption was denied for purely cosmetic services. - AAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.