Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
An operational creditor sought to assail approval of a CIRP resolution plan through collateral proceedings, contending prejudice in payments vis-Ã -vis liquidation value. The record showed the creditor had prior knowledge of the plan and CoC deliberations, including receipt of minutes before adjudicating authority approval, and had even acted on that knowledge by seeking to submit its own plan. Having failed to institute a proper statutory challenge to the plan approval within the prescribed framework, the creditor could not maintain an indirect, parallel challenge to reopen the plan. The appeals were dismissed and the plan approval was left undisturbed. - SC
An operational creditor sought to assail approval of a CIRP resolution plan through collateral proceedings, contending prejudice in payments vis-Ã -vis liquidation value. The record showed the creditor had prior knowledge of the plan and CoC deliberations, including receipt of minutes before adjudicating authority approval, and had even acted on that knowledge by seeking to submit its own plan. Having failed to institute a proper statutory challenge to the plan approval within the prescribed framework, the creditor could not maintain an indirect, parallel challenge to reopen the plan. The appeals were dismissed and the plan approval was left undisturbed. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
