Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Whether an operational creditor's Section 9 application satisfied the statutory monetary threshold required determination of the actual operational debt, including disputes on charging of double licence fee and amenities and the effect of termination of the leave and licence and amenities agreements after expiry of the lock-in period. The adjudicating authority erred by not examining these issues in sufficient depth and by failing to compute the amount due to ascertain if the threshold was crossed, rendering the order non-speaking on a material jurisdictional precondition. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a speaking order. - NCLAT
Whether an operational creditor's Section 9 application satisfied the statutory monetary threshold required determination of the actual operational debt, including disputes on charging of double licence fee and amenities and the effect of termination of the leave and licence and amenities agreements after expiry of the lock-in period. The adjudicating authority erred by not examining these issues in sufficient depth and by failing to compute the amount due to ascertain if the threshold was crossed, rendering the order non-speaking on a material jurisdictional precondition. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a speaking order. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
