Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Where service tax liability was admitted and quantified during investigation prior to the SVLDRS cut-off date of 30.06.2019, the authority could not reject the declarant's SVLDRS Form-1 on the ground that the return was filed belatedly or due to a discrepancy between the quantified amount and the figure stated in Form-1. Quantification before the cut-off satisfied the scheme's eligibility requirement, and denial on that basis was erroneous. The rejection endorsement was quashed, and the authority was directed to issue SVLDRS Form-II, enabling further processing under the scheme; the petition was allowed - HC
Where service tax liability was admitted and quantified during investigation prior to the SVLDRS cut-off date of 30.06.2019, the authority could not reject the declarant's SVLDRS Form-1 on the ground that the return was filed belatedly or due to a discrepancy between the quantified amount and the figure stated in Form-1. Quantification before the cut-off satisfied the scheme's eligibility requirement, and denial on that basis was erroneous. The rejection endorsement was quashed, and the authority was directed to issue SVLDRS Form-II, enabling further processing under the scheme; the petition was allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
