Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
For computing LTCG under the deeming fiction of s.50C, the relevant SRO value is the value prevailing on the date of the operative "agreement to sell"/settlement document, provided the statutory preconditions are satisfied; accordingly, SRO value as on 23.11.2013 was directed for the land covered by the court-recorded compromise, and SRO value as on 12.08.2013 was directed for the land covered by the MOUs. For the balance land not traceable to the compromise/MOUs, SRO value as on the dates of the last registered sale deeds in November 2015 was directed. The appellate order was set aside and recomputation was ordered on these lines - ITAT
For computing LTCG under the deeming fiction of s.50C, the relevant SRO value is the value prevailing on the date of the operative "agreement to sell"/settlement document, provided the statutory preconditions are satisfied; accordingly, SRO value as on 23.11.2013 was directed for the land covered by the court-recorded compromise, and SRO value as on 12.08.2013 was directed for the land covered by the MOUs. For the balance land not traceable to the compromise/MOUs, SRO value as on the dates of the last registered sale deeds in November 2015 was directed. The appellate order was set aside and recomputation was ordered on these lines - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
