Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
In an appeal arising from oppression and mismanagement proceedings under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving allegations of undue gains and filing of false records/documents and a request to implement an equal shareholding pattern between two family groups, the tribunal accepted a post-dispute settlement placed on record through a memorandum. Consideration under the settlement was tendered through two demand drafts produced before the tribunal, with directions for controlled handover and acknowledgments. On that basis, the impugned order under challenge was substituted by the settlement terms, and the appeal was closed in terms of the memorandum of settlement. - NCLAT
In an appeal arising from oppression and mismanagement proceedings under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving allegations of undue gains and filing of false records/documents and a request to implement an equal shareholding pattern between two family groups, the tribunal accepted a post-dispute settlement placed on record through a memorandum. Consideration under the settlement was tendered through two demand drafts produced before the tribunal, with directions for controlled handover and acknowledgments. On that basis, the impugned order under challenge was substituted by the settlement terms, and the appeal was closed in terms of the memorandum of settlement. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.