Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Assessment relating to alleged excess/irregular ITC availment and consequential interest and late-fee liabilities was interfered with on the ground that the matter required reconsideration on merits after a proper reply and supporting documents. The impugned order was directed to be treated as an addendum to the show-cause notice, and the authority was mandated to pass a fresh final order in accordance with law after considering the taxpayer's reply. The remand was made conditional upon deposit of 50% of the disputed tax (in cash through the electronic cash ledger) within 30 days; upon such compliance, the bank-account attachment was to stand automatically vacated and the authority to decide expeditiously. - HC
Assessment relating to alleged excess/irregular ITC availment and consequential interest and late-fee liabilities was interfered with on the ground that the matter required reconsideration on merits after a proper reply and supporting documents. The impugned order was directed to be treated as an addendum to the show-cause notice, and the authority was mandated to pass a fresh final order in accordance with law after considering the taxpayer's reply. The remand was made conditional upon deposit of 50% of the disputed tax (in cash through the electronic cash ledger) within 30 days; upon such compliance, the bank-account attachment was to stand automatically vacated and the authority to decide expeditiously. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.