Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Salary received by a non-resident employee for services rendered entirely outside India was held not to accrue or arise in India under s. 5(2)(b). Applying the settled principle that salary accrues at the place where services are actually rendered, the forum found no material to show that any part of the employment duties corresponding to the impugned salary were performed in India, and it was undisputed that the employee worked in the Philippines during the relevant period. The employer's Indian status and disbursement of salary from India were held insufficient to shift the situs of accrual. Consequently, the foreign assignment salary was excluded from Indian taxation and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Salary received by a non-resident employee for services rendered entirely outside India was held not to accrue or arise in India under s. 5(2)(b). Applying the settled principle that salary accrues at the place where services are actually rendered, the forum found no material to show that any part of the employment duties corresponding to the impugned salary were performed in India, and it was undisputed that the employee worked in the Philippines during the relevant period. The employer's Indian status and disbursement of salary from India were held insufficient to shift the situs of accrual. Consequently, the foreign assignment salary was excluded from Indian taxation and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.