Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Transfer pricing adjustment on purchases from an associated enterprise was disputed, with the assessee benchmarking specified domestic transactions under the CUP method. Since CUP was accepted as the most appropriate method and the assessee's documentation supported that its pricing was at arm's length, the TPO/AO lacked justification to substitute and adjust ALP. The ±5% tolerance was held to be merely a post-determination variation band, and where the charged price falls within that range, no adjustment arises. Consequently, the impugned ALP adjustment on AE purchases was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Transfer pricing adjustment on purchases from an associated enterprise was disputed, with the assessee benchmarking specified domestic transactions under the CUP method. Since CUP was accepted as the most appropriate method and the assessee's documentation supported that its pricing was at arm's length, the TPO/AO lacked justification to substitute and adjust ALP. The ±5% tolerance was held to be merely a post-determination variation band, and where the charged price falls within that range, no adjustment arises. Consequently, the impugned ALP adjustment on AE purchases was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
