Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 98291 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The dominant issue was whether the tax demand order under s.73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 could stand when the taxpayer's reply in Form DRC-06 to the show cause notice was not considered, amounting to breach of principles of natural justice. On that basis, the impugned order confirming SGST/CGST demand with interest and penalty was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits, conditional upon the taxpayer depositing 50% of the disputed tax within 30 days, with any prior recovery to be adjusted towards such pre-deposit. - HC
The dominant issue was whether the tax demand order under s.73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 could stand when the taxpayer's reply in Form DRC-06 to the show cause notice was not considered, amounting to breach of principles of natural justice. On that basis, the impugned order confirming SGST/CGST demand with interest and penalty was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits, conditional upon the taxpayer depositing 50% of the disputed tax within 30 days, with any prior recovery to be adjusted towards such pre-deposit. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
