Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT upheld Revenue's classification of the imported 50 GSM coated paper in rolls under CTSH 4810 13, specifically CTI 4810 13 90, rejecting the appellant's claim for classification under CTI 4810 19 90 or CTI 4810 29 00. Consequently, the benefit of exemption under N/N. 152/2009, as amended by N/N. 66/2016 (S. No. 385), was denied, and the demand for differential customs duty with applicable interest on the wrongly self-assessed Bills of Entry was confirmed. However, CESTAT held that the goods were not liable to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962, and accordingly set aside the confiscation and the penalty imposed under Section 112. The appeal was thus partly allowed.
CESTAT upheld Revenue's classification of the imported 50 GSM coated paper in rolls under CTSH 4810 13, specifically CTI 4810 13 90, rejecting the appellant's claim for classification under CTI 4810 19 90 or CTI 4810 29 00. Consequently, the benefit of exemption under N/N. 152/2009, as amended by N/N. 66/2016 (S. No. 385), was denied, and the demand for differential customs duty with applicable interest on the wrongly self-assessed Bills of Entry was confirmed. However, CESTAT held that the goods were not liable to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962, and accordingly set aside the confiscation and the penalty imposed under Section 112. The appeal was thus partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
