Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. Additions on account of cash and jewellery seized during search were quashed as the assets were not found at premises of the AOP or its members and the consortium itself was not a legal entity. Additions for alleged bogus purchases from three suppliers were deleted, the Tribunal holding that payments were routed through banking channels, recognized in an arbitral award, and advances written off due to delay could not be treated as non-genuine. Disallowance of expenses was also set aside since payments were by cheque with TDS and duly accounted in the AOP's financials. The TP adjustment, based on an improper application of CUP without comparables and contrary to earlier directions, was held unsustainable and the corresponding addition was set aside.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. Additions on account of cash and jewellery seized during search were quashed as the assets were not found at premises of the AOP or its members and the consortium itself was not a legal entity. Additions for alleged bogus purchases from three suppliers were deleted, the Tribunal holding that payments were routed through banking channels, recognized in an arbitral award, and advances written off due to delay could not be treated as non-genuine. Disallowance of expenses was also set aside since payments were by cheque with TDS and duly accounted in the AOP's financials. The TP adjustment, based on an improper application of CUP without comparables and contrary to earlier directions, was held unsustainable and the corresponding addition was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.