Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT held that penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) was leviable only for non-compliance with the main notice u/s 142(1), as the subsequent two communications were mere reminder notices and not independent statutory notices. Since the assessment was framed u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B for AY 2022-23, indicating non-compliance with the primary notice, penalty of Rs. 10,000/- for that default was sustained. However, penalty of Rs. 20,000/- imposed for non-compliance with the two reminder notices was deleted. The assessee's appeal was thus partly allowed, restricting the penalty to Rs. 10,000/-.
ITAT held that penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) was leviable only for non-compliance with the main notice u/s 142(1), as the subsequent two communications were mere reminder notices and not independent statutory notices. Since the assessment was framed u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B for AY 2022-23, indicating non-compliance with the primary notice, penalty of Rs. 10,000/- for that default was sustained. However, penalty of Rs. 20,000/- imposed for non-compliance with the two reminder notices was deleted. The assessee's appeal was thus partly allowed, restricting the penalty to Rs. 10,000/-.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
