Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal and deleted additions made u/s 68. It held that the alleged unexplained cash credit, arising from unsecured loans and a difference in balances between the Assessee and the father, did not pertain to AY 2020-21; hence, the addition could not be sustained. Further, the Assessee had furnished sufficient documentary evidence establishing identity and creditworthiness of the lenders and genuineness of the loan transactions. The AO, despite remand proceedings, failed to bring any cogent material to discredit these documents and merely doubted creditworthiness. Uncontroverted evidence of loan repayments reinforced the Assessee's case. Consequently, all additions u/s 68 were deleted.
ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal and deleted additions made u/s 68. It held that the alleged unexplained cash credit, arising from unsecured loans and a difference in balances between the Assessee and the father, did not pertain to AY 2020-21; hence, the addition could not be sustained. Further, the Assessee had furnished sufficient documentary evidence establishing identity and creditworthiness of the lenders and genuineness of the loan transactions. The AO, despite remand proceedings, failed to bring any cogent material to discredit these documents and merely doubted creditworthiness. Uncontroverted evidence of loan repayments reinforced the Assessee's case. Consequently, all additions u/s 68 were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.