Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC considered an application for regular bail by A1, accused of offences under S.61(2) BNS and Ss.7, 7A PC Act. HC noted the investigation is complete and charge sheets filed, but found strong prima facie material showing A1 as the prime conspirator, having impersonated a CGST Commissioner, orchestrated the demand for illegal gratification, and directed co-accused in execution of the conspiracy. HC relied on CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and corroborative voice sample evidence to conclude A1's presence and role at the place of negotiation. HC further recorded adverse conduct, including evasion of CBI notices under S.35(3) BNSS and avoidance of a non-bailable warrant. Considering parity with co-accused whose bail was rejected and affirmed by SC, HC held the case unfit for bail and dismissed the bail application.
HC considered an application for regular bail by A1, accused of offences under S.61(2) BNS and Ss.7, 7A PC Act. HC noted the investigation is complete and charge sheets filed, but found strong prima facie material showing A1 as the prime conspirator, having impersonated a CGST Commissioner, orchestrated the demand for illegal gratification, and directed co-accused in execution of the conspiracy. HC relied on CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and corroborative voice sample evidence to conclude A1's presence and role at the place of negotiation. HC further recorded adverse conduct, including evasion of CBI notices under S.35(3) BNSS and avoidance of a non-bailable warrant. Considering parity with co-accused whose bail was rejected and affirmed by SC, HC held the case unfit for bail and dismissed the bail application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
