Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that renting of residential dwellings by unregistered landlords to the applicant, a registered entity, constitutes a taxable supply of services to the applicant under GST. The employer-employee relationship applies only between the applicant and its employees, not between the landlords and the applicant; therefore, the exemption for residential dwelling services is inapplicable. Consequently, GST is payable by the applicant under the Reverse Charge Mechanism on rent paid to unregistered landlords. Further, AAR held that, in view of s.17(2) read with s.2(47), the applicant is not eligible to claim ITC on GST paid under reverse charge, as the corresponding outward supply to employees is an exempt supply.
AAR held that renting of residential dwellings by unregistered landlords to the applicant, a registered entity, constitutes a taxable supply of services to the applicant under GST. The employer-employee relationship applies only between the applicant and its employees, not between the landlords and the applicant; therefore, the exemption for residential dwelling services is inapplicable. Consequently, GST is payable by the applicant under the Reverse Charge Mechanism on rent paid to unregistered landlords. Further, AAR held that, in view of s.17(2) read with s.2(47), the applicant is not eligible to claim ITC on GST paid under reverse charge, as the corresponding outward supply to employees is an exempt supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.