Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging attachment of the petitioner's bank account by DGGI, holding that the plea of violation of principles of natural justice was untenable. The HC observed that the petitioner had deliberately concealed material facts, including the ongoing DGGI investigation and details of fraudulently availed ITC, despite having full knowledge thereof, thereby disentitling it to discretionary relief under Article 226. The Court noted that the proper statutory remedy was available under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Act, permitting objections to the freezing order before the Department. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,00,000/-, to be deposited within two weeks with the HC Staff Welfare Fund.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging attachment of the petitioner's bank account by DGGI, holding that the plea of violation of principles of natural justice was untenable. The HC observed that the petitioner had deliberately concealed material facts, including the ongoing DGGI investigation and details of fraudulently availed ITC, despite having full knowledge thereof, thereby disentitling it to discretionary relief under Article 226. The Court noted that the proper statutory remedy was available under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Act, permitting objections to the freezing order before the Department. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,00,000/-, to be deposited within two weeks with the HC Staff Welfare Fund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
