Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the validity of the impugned SCNs issued pursuant to search and seizure conducted at the premises of the petitioner, despite allegations of irregular seizure without a proper panchanama and inadequate documentation. The HC held that objections regarding non-compliance with statutory provisions, including Section 61, procedural infirmities in search and seizure, and alleged denial of adequate opportunity, are matters to be urged before the adjudicating authority in the pending proceedings. Reiterating its earlier order permitting withdrawal of a prior writ to pursue assessment remedies, the HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petitions, granting the petitioner liberty to raise all factual and legal grounds in its reply to the SCNs.
HC upheld the validity of the impugned SCNs issued pursuant to search and seizure conducted at the premises of the petitioner, despite allegations of irregular seizure without a proper panchanama and inadequate documentation. The HC held that objections regarding non-compliance with statutory provisions, including Section 61, procedural infirmities in search and seizure, and alleged denial of adequate opportunity, are matters to be urged before the adjudicating authority in the pending proceedings. Reiterating its earlier order permitting withdrawal of a prior writ to pursue assessment remedies, the HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petitions, granting the petitioner liberty to raise all factual and legal grounds in its reply to the SCNs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
