Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi) in favour of the assessee Society. The Tribunal held that generation of recurring surplus per se does not establish disqualification or profit motive where the Society's objects are educational and surpluses are applied for educational purposes; transfer to a School Development Fund and acquisition of land in the Society's name are not conclusive indicia of non-application. The matter is remitted to the CIT(A) to examine whether the funds and assets have been applied exclusively for the Society's objects and to determine eligibility for registration under s.10(23C)(vi) accordingly.
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi) in favour of the assessee Society. The Tribunal held that generation of recurring surplus per se does not establish disqualification or profit motive where the Society's objects are educational and surpluses are applied for educational purposes; transfer to a School Development Fund and acquisition of land in the Society's name are not conclusive indicia of non-application. The matter is remitted to the CIT(A) to examine whether the funds and assets have been applied exclusively for the Society's objects and to determine eligibility for registration under s.10(23C)(vi) accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.