Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures...
Tax authority's substitution of projected figures with actuals overturned; original acquisition valuation upheld; transfer pricing issues remitted for ALP determination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.