Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures...
Tax authority's substitution of projected figures with actuals overturned; original acquisition valuation upheld; transfer pricing issues remitted for ALP determination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
