Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Page of 4886
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97705 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ insofar as it sought quashing of the impugned demand without compliance with limitation; noting the period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST enactments had expired, the Court remitted the matter to the Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remand is conditional: the Assessee must deposit 50% of the disputed tax, quantified at 1,92,32,187, in cash from its Electronic Cash Ledger within 30 days of receipt of this order. On such deposit, the Respondent shall pass a fresh order after considering payments already made; otherwise the remand terms may be altered. The writ petition is disposed.
HC dismissed the writ insofar as it sought quashing of the impugned demand without compliance with limitation; noting the period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST enactments had expired, the Court remitted the matter to the Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remand is conditional: the Assessee must deposit 50% of the disputed tax, quantified at 1,92,32,187, in cash from its Electronic Cash Ledger within 30 days of receipt of this order. On such deposit, the Respondent shall pass a fresh order after considering payments already made; otherwise the remand terms may be altered. The writ petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
