Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The ITAT set aside the impugned transfer-pricing adjustments and remitted issues to the AO/TPO for fresh determination. With respect to the ITES segment, the Tribunal directed a detailed FAR analysis of transactions with non-UK AEs to assess comparability with UK transactions resolved under the MAP; if comparable, the 18% operating-cost margin agreed by the Competent Authorities shall be applied. The manufacturing-segment comparables were also remitted for a fresh FAR and comparability analysis, with specific instruction to apply related-party, import/export and turnover filters under Rules 10B(2)-10B(3). The addition relating to management charges was dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee to be afforded opportunity of hearing and to furnish documentation.
The ITAT set aside the impugned transfer-pricing adjustments and remitted issues to the AO/TPO for fresh determination. With respect to the ITES segment, the Tribunal directed a detailed FAR analysis of transactions with non-UK AEs to assess comparability with UK transactions resolved under the MAP; if comparable, the 18% operating-cost margin agreed by the Competent Authorities shall be applied. The manufacturing-segment comparables were also remitted for a fresh FAR and comparability analysis, with specific instruction to apply related-party, import/export and turnover filters under Rules 10B(2)-10B(3). The addition relating to management charges was dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee to be afforded opportunity of hearing and to furnish documentation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.